The Integration of Claims to Health-Care: a Programming Approach
No 45, Open Discussion Papers in Economics from The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics
The paper contributes to the use of social choice and welfare theory in health economics by developing and applying the integration of claims framework to health-care rationing. Related to Sens critique of neo-classical welfare economics, the integration of claims framework recognises three primitive sources of claim: consequences, deontology and procedures. A taxonomy is presented with the aid of which it is shown that social welfare functions reflecting these claims individually or together, can be specified. Some of the resulting social choice rules can be regarded as generalisations of health-maximisation and all have normative justifications, though the justifications may not be universally acceptable. The paper shows how non-linear programming can be used to operationalize such choice rules and illustrates their differential impacts on the optimal provision of health-care. Following discussion of relations to the capabilities framework and the context in which rationing occurs, the paper concludes that the integration of claims provides a viable framework for modelling health-care rationing that is technically rigorous, general and tractable, as well as being consistent with relevant moral considerations and citizen preferences.
Keywords: non-linear programming; social welfare function; health-care rationing; QALY; capabilities; economic paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 29 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 731-745, September
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Journal Article: The integration of claims to health-care: a programming approach (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:opn:wpaper:45
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Open Discussion Papers in Economics from The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IT team member ().