Comprehension To Village

M Chairul Basrun Umanailo, Idrus Hentihu, Rosita Umanailo, , Hamiru, Mansyur Nawawi, Sukainap Pulhehe, Mirja Ohoibor, Mohammad Faisal Sangadji, Nurhaya Yusuf and Mohamad Nur Deny Musa
Additional contact information
M Chairul Basrun Umanailo: Universitas Iqra Buru

No yuavq, INA-Rxiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: It has become very clear, where almost all “village” ontologies emphasize more on the existence of an area / region, as well as the recognition of values inherent in activities, and tend to be made different, especially administratively. We certainly do not deny that administratively the distinction between Village and non-village is needed to facilitate the identification and resolution of problems. But in fact, we find that many villages are more interpreted as something that is not the same as other regions in terms of socio-cultural economic justice and even public policy. So the administrative differentiation then decreases to the distinction between the attitudes of anyone trying to understand the village.

Date: 2017-12-30
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5b5f9f80fd63eb000e58f4c7/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:inarxi:yuavq

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/yuavq

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in INA-Rxiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().