Responding to Disinformation: Ten Recommendations for Regulatory Action and Forbearance

Christopher T. Marsden, Ian Brown and Michael Veale
Additional contact information
Michael Veale: University College London

No aerw9_v1, LawArchive from Center for Open Science

Abstract: in Martin Moore & Damian Tambini (eds.) Dealing with Digital Dominance (OUP 2021) 195-220 doi:10.1093/oso/9780197616093.003.0012 This chapter elaborates on challenges and emerging best practices for state regulation of electoral disinformation throughout the electoral cycle. It is based on research for three studies during 2018-20: into election cybersecurity for the Commonwealth (Brown et al. 2020); on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to regulate disinformation for the European Parliament (Marsden & Meyer 2019a; Meyer et al. 2020); and for UNESCO, the United Nations body responsible for education (Kalina et al. 2020). The research covers more than half the world’s nations, and substantially more than half that population, and in 2019 the two largest democratic elections in history: India’s general election and the European Parliamentary elections.

Date: 2021-10-22
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5fae844a80ff8e014f8d970f/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:lawarc:aerw9_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/aerw9_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LawArchive from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().