United States V. Blaszczak Brings Insider Trading Law to a Tipping Point

Michael T. Byrne

No jg4u3_v1, LawArchive from Center for Open Science

Abstract: This Note examines the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. Blaszczak and argues that the court erred in eliminating the personal benefit requirement for insider trading prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 1348. The Note contends that the decision departs from established insider trading doctrine, creates an unjustified distinction between civil and criminal enforcement, and increases uncertainty in securities fraud law. It concludes that courts should apply the personal benefit requirement to § 1348 cases and that Congress or the Supreme Court should clarify the statute’s scope. [This abstract was written by Microsoft Copilot, a generative artificial intelligence.]

Date: 2026-09-28
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6ab6910dbe03c3d3f7f1938e/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:lawarc:jg4u3_v1

DOI: 10.31228/osf.io/jg4u3_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LawArchive from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().