Servers and Waiters: What Matters in the Law of A.I

Ignacio Cofone
Additional contact information
Ignacio Cofone: McGill University

No 2nstf, LawRxiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: The European Parliament’s recent declaration that robots are “electronic persons” illustrates the widespread uncertainty about how to regulate robots and artificial intelligence (A.I.) agents. This article aims to confront that uncertainty. To date, most regulations have treated robots and A.I. agents either as tools or people, making questionable assignments of rights and responsibilities. Instead, regulations should reckon that robots and A.I. agents escape this dichotomy. The law must assign rights and responsibilities for entities with characteristics that exist on a continuum between tools and people. This article describes this continuum through three characteristics that help us consistently place robots and A.I. agents along it: emergence, embodiment, and social valence. It proposes a framework for analogizing A.I. entities to existing entities that the law already understands, thereby creating a baseline for assigning rights and responsibilities for their actions.

Date: 2019-02-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pay
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5c5f8cc2832ca60019ab8176/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:lawarx:2nstf

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2nstf

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LawRxiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().