From Data to Decisions: Applying Inferential Statistics to Longitudinal N-of-1 Data to Evaluate Intervention Effects – A Narrative Review

Felicitas Kininger, Simon Edward Blackwell, Julia Glombiewski and Saskia Scholten
Additional contact information
Simon Edward Blackwell: University of Göttingen, Germany
Saskia Scholten: RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau

No 97z23_v2, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Introduction: Psychology is shifting from group-based designs to idiographic approaches, raising questions about suitable analytical methods. While a full review across subfields is beyond this paper’s scope, psychotherapy research serves as a representative example. Single Case Experimental Designs (SCEDs) can be used to estimate meaningful intervention effects for individuals, but selecting among many evaluation methods is challenging. This study provides a comprehensive overview of SCED analysis methods, assessing their strengths and limitations to guide scientific and clinical decision-making. Method: A literature search was conducted to identify methods suited to compare a baseline to an intervention phase, to be used with idiographic or non-standardized items and with repeated evaluations during ongoing therapy. To illustrate these methods, data from a clinical single case is analyzed and interpreted as an example. Results: Seventeen relevant peer-reviewed articles on SCEDs and clinical decision-making were identified. NAP, Tau-BC, and the Bayes Factor emerged as particularly suitable methods, though further validation is needed. Method selection highly depends on data characteristics, with nonoverlap approaches preferred for non-parametric data and SMA or DARCI suitable for small datasets. The case study revealed challenges in interpreting and combining different methods, emphasizing the need for clearer guidelines. Discussion: While no single method is universally optimal, future research should refine existing approaches, compare them systematically, and integrate clinical perspectives to develop clearer guidelines. Beyond identifying a gold standard, ensuring practical implementation remains a key challenge.

Date: 2025-06-18
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6852ccd2d29c2c5373eb7268/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:97z23_v2

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/97z23_v2

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().