Assimilation, Emigration and Mobilization: Elite Responses to Territorial Conquest

Roberto Valli
Additional contact information
Roberto Valli: ETH Zürich

No cqr68_v2, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Territorial conquest is commonly assumed to generate backlash among the conquered population. This paper argues that responses to annexation can instead vary between emigration, assimilation, and mobilization. I test the argument on Alsace-Lorraine, a region annexed twice by Germany and France between 1850 and 1938. Using novel spatial data on historical book publications to measure linguistic behavior of local elites and a difference-in-differences design, I find that both conquests caused large shifts toward the language of the conquering state. These shifts were driven by the substitution of authors, but also by systematic linguistic assimilation. Moreover, conquest promoted the mobilization of regionalist discourse, which most likely served as a tool for local elites to advocate local interests while integrating into the conquering state, rather than an secessionist form of identification.

Date: 2025-04-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/67febf03cd28cf18dccc4cae/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cqr68_v2

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cqr68_v2

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().