Regulate, Promote, or Study? Measuring the Policy Orientation of U.S. State Artificial Intelligence Legislation

Stefani Langehennig and Dani Roney
Additional contact information
Stefani Langehennig: University of Denver

No 394mj_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: State legislatures have become the primary venue for artificial intelligence (AI) poli- cymaking in the United States, but existing measures of state AI activity count bills without distinguishing what those bills actually do. This research note introduces a new measure of the policy orientation of state AI legislation. Drawing on a corpus of approximately 1.45 million state bills, we identify 3,124 high-confidence AI bills using a validated two-tier keyword system benchmarked against the National Conference of State Legislatures’ AI legislation database. We then classify each bill as regulatory, promotional, or procedural using a large language model with human validation. Regu- latory bills dominate the agenda (61.7%), but one in four AI bills is purely procedural: task forces, studies, and reports that create no substantive policy. The measure sep- arates legislative activity from governance commitment and provides a resource for research on technology federalism, policy diffusion, and symbolic politics.

Date: 2026-07-18
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6a5a4c2f04720f912c025eb1/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:394mj_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/394mj_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().