EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Under-reporting research relevant to local needs in the global south. Database biases in the representation of knowledge on rice

Ismael Rafols, Tommaso Ciarli and Diego Chavarro

No 3kf9d, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Although the main bibliometric databases (Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus) claim to include journals on the basis of scientific and publication standards, there have long been concerns that its coverage is biased in favour of journals from industrialised countries and towards topics relevant to these countries. In this article, we investigate this claim for research on rice, comparing the database CAB Abstracts with the mainstream databases. We find clear evidence that for a field such as rice, statistics based on WoS and Scopus strongly under-represent the scientific production by developing countries, and over-represent production by industrialised countries. More importantly, we also find a substantial bias in coverage of different research topics. WoS and Scopus have a ~75% coverage of publications in molecular biology and issues related to consumption, but a much lower coverage (20-30% in WoS and 30-50% in Scopus) for research more directly related to rice production such as plant nutrition, diseases and characteristics. CAB Abstracts coverage is above 80% for all topics except consumption. The study suggests that statistics based on mainstream databases provide a significantly distorted view of the amount of research and diversity of agendas in most countries. Given that bibliometric statistics are often used for benchmarking and evaluation purposes, the database biases may translate into policy framings that undervalue domestic capabilities and research agendas more attuned to local needs in the global south.

Date: 2015-10-14
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5f7890fa1cfe6901e2cf7350/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:3kf9d

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3kf9d

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:3kf9d