An anatomy of digital technology bans

Clara Iglesias Keller and Naomi Appelman

No 3nhrj_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Calls to ban digital technologies gained traction across liberal democracies, while similar measures in other contexts are portrayed as hallmarks of authoritarian governance. These bans rarely amount to complete prohibitions, appear in various contexts, and serve different political aims. We argue that, before engaging the normative question of legitimacy, regulatory scholarship must clarify what “technology bans” are. We propose a conceptual framework that understands technology bans primarily as regulatory discourse: narratives, justifications, and disputes that shape regulation. Drawing on discourse theory in public policy, we develop a typology of technology bans discourses, identifying three types: geopolitical measures, protection of vulnerable populations, and public interest bans. Our analysis demonstrates that they function as regulatory frames that communicate authority, sovereignty, and democratic control over technological development. By unpacking their discursive structure, the paper contributes to the understanding of technology bans as a regulatory category and to ongoing debates about technology governance and democratic legitimacy.

Date: 2026-03-13
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pay and nep-reg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69b2c58902a4a72f5fdc74e0/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:3nhrj_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3nhrj_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().