An Astonishing Turn in the Attribution Debate on the Law of Comparative Advantage

Jorge Morales Meoqui

No 4h5ks_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: The law of comparative advantage cannot be attributed to David Ricardo, James Mill, Robert Torrens or John Stuart Mill. Their writings, much like those of Adam Smith, strictly adhere to the classical rule for specialization, which asserts that one should acquire commodities abroad whenever offered cheaper than it would cost to produce them locally. They all viewed the cheaper price of foreign commodities as the logical starting point and condicio sine qua non of most exchanges between countries. Furthermore, the popular narrative about Ricardo’s alleged formulation of an alternative rule for specialization – the law or principle of comparative advantage – results from a misinterpretation of the well-known numerical example presented in Chapter 7 of his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. John Stuart Mill is largely responsible for this misinterpretation; he obviously deserves no recognition or praise for that.

Date: 2026-04-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69f302d44841a03d62235be1/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:4h5ks_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4h5ks_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().