Money in the Bank: Progressive Problem Shifts in Criminological Science

Jonathan R. Brauer and Jacob C. Day

No 5af2s_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Criminology struggles to achieve progressive problem shifts, or cumulative theoretical development common in fields like physics and biology. This stems from a “precision crisis”: a tendency to accept imprecise descriptions, vague theoretical predictions, and analytical practices that obscure data. Drawing on Meehl’s framework, we argue criminological knowledge risks resembling “Monopoly money in the bank” rather than genuine scientific currency. We propose fundamental shifts: prioritizing precise description of concrete phenomena, subjecting theories to risky tests, critically questioning psychometric assumptions, and generating high-resolution data. While academic incentives are a significant barrier, we also explore arguments that these incentives may reflect deeper disciplinary tendencies that favor broader narratives over precise, falsifiable knowledge. The path toward cumulative criminology involves developing approaches that precisely capture complexity while yielding falsifiable knowledge, rather than lowering standards.

Date: 2025-05-23
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/682fb26be1e68cca3db06c8b/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:5af2s_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/5af2s_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().