Motivation Without Slope: ADHD, Demand Avoidance, and the Moralisation of Misfit

Brian McCallion

No 6d4px_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Modern work and support systems often assume that effort translates into action in a steady and predictable way through routine, reinforcement, and private self-management, embedding this expectation in institutional infrastructure. For many people with ADHD, this expectation does not hold. Traction can be discontinuous and highly context-dependent, and sustained functioning is often achieved through compensatory pathways such as urgency and acute pressure rather than stable routines. While these strategies can enable short-term performance, they can also be costly when chronic stress becomes the main route to action. When institutions treat their motivational expectations as universal, differences in regulation are frequently moralised as laziness, unreliability, or defiance, and people are praised for crisis performance but blamed for later collapse. Drawing on disability studies, this paper frames these dynamics as institutional misfit rather than individual pathology. It introduces “assumed motivational gradient” as a descriptive metaphor for institutional design bias and outlines implications for disability-informed practice.

Date: 2026-02-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6995fb2f86748594747aff12/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:6d4px_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6d4px_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().