Fulfilling Potential? Fulfilling Potential? ESA and the fate of the work-related activity group

Catherine Hale

No 6jcrg, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: In 2008 the UK Government introduced conditionality and sanctions to a group of incapacity benefit claimants placed in the ‘work-related activity group’ (WRAG) of the new Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) benefit. A survey of 500 WRAG participants explored their experiences of this policy, delivered by both private contractors, (the ‘Work Programme’), and the State provider, (Jobcentre Plus), including job outcomes, and psychosocial impacts. Results: No meaningful difference was observed between types of provision. Only 8% of respondents achieved a job outcome. Generic work preparation activities did not address health or structural exclusion from the labour market. Providers failed to make reasonable adjustments to enable participation in compulsory activities. The administration of conditionality caused significant anxiety and distress. WRAG participants were left fearful, demoralised, and less optimistic about job aspirations than before. Conclusion: the rationale for ESA, i.e. ending ‘welfare dependency’, is flawed. Evidence-based programmes of employment support should be offered instead to those in the WRAG, on a voluntary basis.

Date: 2014-06-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6575c10acb0b0b14d27fc0b1/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:6jcrg

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6jcrg

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().