‘Must Fix Trust’: Privacy-enhancing technologies as reductive tool

Tom Barbereau and , Thijmen
Additional contact information
Tom Barbereau: Dutch Organisation of Applied Scientific Research

No 7kaxj_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Privacy-enhancing and other related digital technologies are marketed as increasing trust within the digital society. They are deployed as means to assert trust in digital transactions and interactions between actors. What this commentary argues is that digital trust is thereby reduced to the product of a technological iteration, insertion, or fix: more encryption ≃ more privacy ≃ more trust. However righteous it may be to foster privacy, the promise to uphold something as uncertain as trust by the use of mathematics and/or statistics alone is short-sighted. Lofty notions like ‘data minimisation’ and ‘privacy-by-design’ rest on deterministic assumptions. We suggest that in reductively appropriating the concept of trust and failing to meet expectations, the consequences of the technification of trust – i.e., the making of trust a product of technê (alone) – are paradoxical in that they actually undermine trust, by centralising power within tech companies.

Date: 2025-07-15
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pay
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6877a452acac7ecdce5a9ab3/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:7kaxj_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7kaxj_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().