How Policies Become Contested: A Spiral of Imagination and Evidence in a Large Infrastructure Project

Eva Wolf and Wouter Van Dooren
Additional contact information
Wouter Van Dooren: University of Antwerp

No 8grp4, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: This article investigates how framing processes lead to polarization in the public debate on a large infrastructure project. Drawing on an analysis of newspaper articles about the Oosterweelconnection in Antwerp (Belgium), it concludes that framing through imaginative appeals and framing through evidence mutually reinforce each other in a spiralling pattern. When evidence backs up appeals to the imagination, such as when facts back up metaphors, these appeals are endowed with authority and hence legitimacy. While this strengthens appeals that have been ”proven” to be true, it also makes actors backing these appeals increasingly frustrated with other parties that still refuse to accept them. Because of their frustration, the former are spurred to launch new imaginative appeals conveying their anger and to seek new evidence to substantiate these new appeals. Over time, as parties in a conflict grapple with evidence and imagination, their tolerance for ambiguity decreases and the debate polarizes.

Date: 2017-01-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/5af94c687bf0b90010e6af9d/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:8grp4

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8grp4

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().