Surveying Citizens with a Migration Background - A Quantitative Study on Identification versus Categorization

Sanne van Oosten

No 9cqnk_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Survey research on racial/ethnic minority citizens of Germany and the Netherlands tends to use the category migration background, instead of measuring whether that category has any meaning for respondents by asking how they identify. Through surveying 1864 respondents in Germany and the Netherlands, including 401 respondents with a background in Türkiye, this paper shows that those who identify as Turkish hold different attitudes than those who have a background in Türkiye but who identify as German or Dutch. I provide proof of this with attitudes towards topics often associated with citizens with a migration background: belonging, Islam and sexuality. Respondents with a background in Türkiye, who do not identify as Turkish, hold the same attitudes as those without a migration background, and significantly different attitudes than when a researcher would categorize them with those having a migration background in Türkiye. This demonstrates that using identification rather than categorization yields more accurate and meaningful insights into respondents’ attitudes. Beyond this empirical advantage to identification over categorization, this paper outlines additional conceptual, methodological, and normative advantages to measuring identification in surveys.

Date: 2026-01-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/695e58dcb75fa1d4dd6ad2a8/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:9cqnk_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9cqnk_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().