Administrative Trauma and Performativity: Reconciling Identity, Ethics, Morals, and Pragmatics across Operational Strata During Complex Humanitarian Emergencies

Amaya Alexandra Ramos

No fb3s5_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: As in many professions, human-focused administrative personnel must balance public perception with both safety and desirable service outcomes. Those with high-level, yet ultimately intermediary coordinating roles, have the added pressure of unifying interest blocs situated across varying operational strata, each moving at its own tempo and in accordance with its own objectives. At times, these diverse priorities may even be in direct contradiction. However, while such brokering may be natural to the role, successful management of complex humanitarian emergencies requires extreme clarity of focus and vision, and as such, there is a heightened emphasis on harmonizing operations towards these larger objectives at all costs, often doing so in environments that are under-resourced in terms of information, materials, manpower, training, and political support. In addition to these baseline stressors, public administrators specifically carry the performance pressure of serving as proxies for a large, optics-and ethics-sensitive social apparatus —the government— whose operations must be upheld through careful calibration of the social contract. In the course of emergency response, such personnel must therefore navigate traumatic situations that may violate aspects of their deeply held personal beliefs, all while strictly managing personal affect. These cognitive, ethical, and moral reconciliation processes can be intensely draining, and without a minimum amount of decision making authority combined with specialized logistical and emotional support, specialized administrative personnel may be at risk for a unique and intense kind of moral injury stemming from unremitting crisis combined with suppression of their instinct for advocacy. Via this lens, and in the interest of calling for greater literature on the humanitarian political economy, as well as administrative experiences within migration health research, this report briefly recounts various aspects of the administrative moral injury borne by United States public servants and similar personnel during the 2021 evacuation of eligible parties from Afghanistan following the U.S. military withdrawal from the country and the ensuing Taliban takeover.

Date: 2026-06-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6a32f43a906808f6a39451ea/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:fb3s5_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/fb3s5_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().