Insufficiently Affordable: Public Opinion About Housing Affordability

Tali Mendelberg, Gustavo Novoa and Adrian C. Pietrzak
Additional contact information
Tali Mendelberg: Princeton University
Gustavo Novoa: Princeton University

No frehb_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Americans want government to improve housing affordability. Yet proposals for affordable housing often encounter public resistance. We argue for a neglected explanation: concerns that these proposals are insufficiently affordable. Using four original surveys with novel, precise measures of affordability and randomized developer and landlord profiteering, we find wide support for affordable housing when it primarily benefits people of low means and does not favor developer or landlord profiteering. This support holds even when the hypothetical building is proposed in the respondent’s neighborhood, support entails tradeoffs and costly behavior in the survey, and the policy requires tax increases. The tax finding replicates in election outcomes of actual ballot measures. Pro-poor sentiments shape these preferences, above and beyond self-interest, and offset the negative impact of racial attitudes. Buildings and policies that satisfy these sentiments draw much higher public support. However, common policies fail to do so.

Date: 2026-08-28
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hre and nep-mid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6a8ef7762fe7065b6be39f84/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:frehb_v1

DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/frehb_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().