What did they expect? The affective, relational and structural dimensions of “good” research culture in postdoctoral supervision

Mollie Etheridge, Molly Smih, Lara Abel, Jessica Hampton, Luisa Ciampi, Allison Beggs, Noam Tal-Perry, ARRC - Debbie Birkett, Marie Collier and Katherine M. Dawson
Additional contact information
Noam Tal-Perry: University of Oxford

No h7yzv_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Across European research systems, there is growing policy interest in improving what has come to be known as research culture. While poor research culture, particularly that experienced by postdoctoral researchers, has been linked to negative wellbeing outcomes, bullying and overwork, there remains limited clarity around what “good” research culture is, how it is experienced and how it is produced. In this article, we explore how postdocs define and conceptualise contributions to “good” research culture by reviewing postdoc nominations of their principal investigators (PI) or research group to a celebratory event for good practice. Inductive analysis of nomination and interview data suggest that “good” research culture and supervision taps into affective, relational and structural dimensions, with postdocs reporting how they value feeling safe, respected and as though their PI has accepted some responsibility for their career development and prospects. Interviews with the nominated PIs also highlight the challenges they experience in balancing the needs of their postdocs with the parameters for academic success and progression set by institutions and the structures of project-based work. By identifying how value systems that prioritise competition can define researcher priorities, expectations and the identification of what feels good, the paper contributes to debates around policy and theory, and highlights the difficulties associated with evaluating “good” research “culture” to raise questions about the direction and implementation of research culture initiatives.

Date: 2026-05-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sog
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69fc80643a614b0440f1ffc7/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:h7yzv_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/h7yzv_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().