Beyond Humanitarian and Securitization Paradigms. Cultural mediation, local governance, and the missing layer in European migration integration policies

Anatoliy Aleksandrov

No jgu8h_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: European migration governance remains largely deadlocked between two dominant frameworks: rights-based humanitarian protection and state-led securitization. While both address critical vectors – namely baseline legal admission and public order – they systematically bypass the post-arrival phase, where long-term integration dynamics are actually negotiated through daily contact between newcomers, host populations, and municipal state organs. This paper argues that chronic integration failures stem primarily from structural deficiencies in this post-arrival architecture, specifically the lack of institutionalized, professional socio-cultural mediation. We introduce the concept of localized social stabilization mechanisms to capture community-level adjustments occurring when residents perceive formal institutions as incapable of managing rapid demographic shifts, maintaining normative predictability, or enforcing civic reciprocity. Rather than treating these grassroots frictions as mere expressions of xenophobia, our framework approaches them as complex sociological indicators of institutional trust decay. Using a constructivist-institutionalist lens, the paper outlines a five-dimensional integration matrix: legal admission, socio-economic participation, cultural adaptation, civic reciprocity, and local trust-building. Our central contribution is the conceptualization of a “missing layer” – a professionalized, locally deployed mediation infrastructure – as a structural prerequisite for sustainable integration. Ultimately, the analysis demonstrates how strengthening this relational layer allows municipal states to transition from reactive crisis management to adaptive governance models capable of balancing social cohesion with broader European human rights obligations. At the same time, the framework stresses the asymmetrical nature of adaptation: cultural mediation should primarily facilitate newcomers’ acquisition of core host society norms (rule of law, gender equality, secular public space, and individual rights) rather than open-ended mutual compromise.

Date: 2026-06-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6a267d5bab7da7c4b86d838b/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:jgu8h_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/jgu8h_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().