Multiple causal mechanisms link biodiversity conservation initiatives with human well-being

Louise Glew, Daniel C. Miller and Michael B Mascia

No mrn34_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Sustainability science and sustainable development policies increasingly recognize the contribution of biodiversity conservation to human well-being. However, understanding of the linkages between conservation and human well-being remains limited. Empirical evidence on the existence, magnitude and variation in causal pathways is fragmented, hampering decision-makers’ ability to design conservation interventions that also support human well-being. Here we present a conceptual framework that identifies five major pathways through which conservation interventions affect human well-being: 1) governance, 2) ideas and information, 3) conservation infrastructure, 4) ancillary opportunities, and 5) ecosystem services. These pathways may interact, creating novel synergies and trade-offs, scale-dependency, and distributive effects that shape an intervention’s social impact. Use of such a multi-causal framework can help avoid skewing policy decisions and investments toward any one pathway. Recognition of the diverse mechanisms linking conservation and human well-being allows scholars and practitioners to better assess the contribution of biodiversity conservation to global sustainability.

Date: 2026-11-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6aec060bfd45a67a369d429e/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:mrn34_v1

DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/mrn34_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().