Beyond “More Parental Alienation Science”: Evidentiary Governance, Social Welfare Risk, and Credibility-Cue Laundering in Contested Family-Law Domains

Stanley A PhD Korosi
Additional contact information
Stanley A PhD Korosi: University of the Sunshine Coast

No n2ghr_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Contested domains in family law are increasingly shaped by credibility-cue laundering, in which low-quality research or argument acquires institutional influence through surface signals of authority (for example, DOI assignment, “peer-reviewed” labelling, platform branding, and citation or download metrics). Where these cues obscure differences in evidentiary quality, legal and policy actors may treat contested claims as decision-relevant evidence even when integrity signals are weak. In this ecology, producing more high-quality research is necessary for scientific credibility but insufficient for reducing the spread and institutional impact of low-quality claims. The parental alienation (PA) field is an example of a contested domain. It attracts critique ranging from methodologically robust challenges to rhetorically amplified claims that rely primarily on surface credibility cues rather than defensible evidentiary standards. This article does not treat critique of PA as misinformation per se; rather, it distinguishes legitimate critique from critique that relies on misleading credibility cues, low-integrity publication pathways, or poor evidentiary standards. In some cases, such critique may be mobilised as misinformation in legal, welfare, and policy forums, with potentially serious consequences for affected parties, including children. This article offers two case studies of misinformation proliferation and institutional response. It assesses their implications using a framework for analysing misinformation and proposes safeguards relevant to family law, social welfare, and policy actors working in contested evidentiary domains.

Date: 2026-03-20
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69bbb958bbfd893f5e457915/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:n2ghr_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/n2ghr_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().