Cross-Validation as a Bandwidth Criterion for Geographically Weighted PCA: An Ethics of Ambiguity
Andrew Kampfschulte
Additional contact information
Andrew Kampfschulte: Univeristy of Southern California
No rbnep_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Abstract:
Geographically weighted principal component analysis (GWPCA) summarizes spatial multivariate structure through local eigen decompositions whose output depends strongly on a bandwidth, conventionally chosen by leave-one-out cross-validation (CV). While locating the bandwidth that minimizes CV, several competing minima are frequently observed. We focus on the implications of multiple ambiguous minima as the object of study. We formalize it through the CV-equivalent set ($H_{\mathrm{CV}}$) of bandwidths that the data do not distinguish from the CV minimum ($h_{CV}$) and show that bandwidths within this set differ materially in their bias--variance composition and loading structure. Simulations across eight data-generating processes show that wherever the covariance subspace varied locally, the equivalent set spanned roughly a quarter of the candidate range grid, and the oracle bandwidth typically lay inside the set while differing from $h_{CV}$. In applications to the Dublin voter turnout and the Kola geochemical survey, the same ambiguity appeared, and within-set disagreement between local loadings concentrated where the local eigengap was small. We offer these findings as the first in-depth study of the characteristics of CV as used in GWPCA, and recommend reporting standards to include the equivalent set, and mapping the local eigengap.
Date: 2026-09-21
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6aad6328454107c5a0ebb198/
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:rbnep_v1
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/rbnep_v1
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().