Ethical Complexity and Service Delivery in Remote Indigenous Communities

Edward Watt

No rj84b_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: The scale and scope of disadvantage in remote indigenous communities means that ethical dilemmas are day-to-day realities for practitioners. Persistent hardship, disadvantage and discrimination - amid omnipresent policy initiatives aimed at combating them - exacerbate these dilemmas and are a perennial source of workplace tension. Frequently these tensions escalate to the point of unworkability among those tasked with collaborating in the interests of the community. Under the guise of accountability or advocacy of justice, and backed by the (perceived) power of the state, conflict among practitioners often leads to factionalism, standoffs and can escalate to bullying, harassment, violence and lawsuits. This article proposes a simple heuristic for ethical deliberation among those working in remote Indigenous community governance. Drawing on deontological and consequentialist ethics, as well as the policy literature, it provides a framework to structure conversations on ethics in decision-making.

Date: 2025-12-16
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/694069a63596eccfc5489408/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:rj84b_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rj84b_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().