Another Empty Promise of Grade Retention? Peer Effects of Classmate Retention

Samuel Jalalian and Fabian T. Pfeffer
Additional contact information
Fabian T. Pfeffer: LMU Munich

No thqm9_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Grade retention is a common but costly educational practice and studies have repeatedly shown that, in many contexts, it offers no academic benefit to retained students. A remaining justification for its continued use is the presumed benefit for the promoted peers from whose class the retained student was removed. This study tests that assumption using longitudinal data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) and a difference-in-differences approach, focusing on grades and competencies from Grades 1 to 9. Results predominantly yield null findings, with a small positive effect on mathematics grades in lower secondary education (0.08–0.09 SD) as the only exception. Overall, our findings do not provide support for presumed peer benefits as a justification for grade retention.

Date: 2026-10-29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6ae382026125bccca5f7bcde/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:thqm9_v1

DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/thqm9_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().