Improving Small-Area Estimates of Public Opinion by Calibrating to Known Population Quantities

William Marble and Joshua Clinton

No u3ekq_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Multilevel regression and poststratification is widely used to estimate opinion in small geographies and to adjust unrepresentative surveys — and has become a mainstay in the study of dyadic representation. Yet, errors generated by nonignorable non-response and modeling uncertainty make discrepancies between public opinion and policy outcomes difficult to interpret. We propose a principled, data-driven method to leverage auxiliary quantities with known marginal distributions — e.g., election outcomes — to improve estimates of policy attitudes. Our method estimates the geographic correlation between the auxiliary variables and the outcomes of interest, then adjusts the estimates using observed errors in the auxiliary variable estimate. We illustrate our approach using a pre-election poll measuring support for an abortion referendum, finding that the method reduces county-level error by two-thirds. We find similarly dramatic improvements estimating precinct-level opinion. Our method generates new possibilities for accurately estimating policy attitudes at previously unattainable levels of geographic resolution.

Date: 2024-05-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6658e0d20f8c8002aa3c92cc/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:u3ekq_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/u3ekq_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().