Thinking Allowed: Reforming Indicator-Based Accountability to Enhance Innovation
Wouter Van Dooren and
Additional contact information
Wouter Van Dooren: University of Antwerp
No z4vk2, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
This text proposes some prospective directions for performance indicators based on a critical analysis of indicator-based accountability. We argue that performance indicators should be used for learning and innovation rather than for indicator-based accountability. Accountability can only enhance innovation when it allows for staff and stakeholders to critically think about the results. They have to engage in a performance dialogue on the meaning of indicators that also accounts for complexity. Indicator-based accountability, however, typically does not allow for such thinking. In our view, reforming accountability therefore implies that results- based accountability needs to be saved from its indicators.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:z4vk2
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().