Better guidance is needed for editorial expressions of concern
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva and
Maryna Nazarovets
No zv8tw, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Abstract:
On occasion, following the publication of a preprint or paper, serious concerns might be raised, either about the study, the author(s), or background processes related to either or all of these aspects. When editors-in-chief (EiCs) have sufficient evidence and/or feedback from the authors and/or their institute, in the case of a serious ethical offense or methodological errors that may invalidate the paper’s findings or ethical standing, they can retract the paper rapidly. However, in the interim period between receiving a report and seeking a solution, several weeks, months or even years might pass, and readers need to be alerted to its potential unreliability. In such an instance, the current alertive (but not corrective) document takes the form of an editorial expression of concern (EoC). However, a case might be unresolved for a long period of time, with an EoC attached to it, so EiCs are encouraged to seek a resolution as promptly as possible because there are academics who might need to cite and/or rely on that paper. Curiously, even though a comprehensive debate is provided by COPE ethics guidelines and ICMJE recommendations, which refer to EoCs, guidance is not entirely clear. For example, some COPE members issue a single EoC with a single digital object identifier for a cluster of papers, while other COPE members issue one EoC per paper. This paper makes an attempt to improve guidelines that editors could consider when faced with the dilemma of whether to issue an EoC, or not.
Date: 2023-05-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6450151e96997700958789e5/
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:zv8tw
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/zv8tw
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().