Spinning the Industrial Revolution
Jane Humphries and
No _145, Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics
Abstract: The prevailing explanation for why the Industrial Revolution occurred first in Britain is Robert Allenâ€™s (2009) â€˜highâ€ wage economyâ€™ view, which claims that the high cost of labour relative to capital and fuel incentivized innovation and the adoption of new techniques. This paper presents new empirical evidence on hand spinning before the Industrial Revolution and demonstrates that there was no such â€˜highâ€ wage economyâ€™ in spinning, a leading sector of industrialization. We quantify the working lives of frequently ignored female and child spinners who were crucial to the British textile industry in the Early Modern period with evidence of productivity and wages from the late sixteenth to the early nineteenth century. Our results show that spinning was a widespread, lowâ€ wage, lowâ€ productivity employment, in line with the Humphries (2013) view of the motivations for the factory system.
Keywords: Hand spinning; WomenÊ¹s wages; Industrial Revolution; Textiles; Great Divergence; High Wage Economy interpretation of invention and innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 J31 J42 J46 N13 N33 N63 O14 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-ino
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:esohwp:_145
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ().