Gender Equality, Growth, and How a Technological Trap Destroyed Female Work
Jane Humphries and
No _191, Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics
Development economists have long studied the relationship between gender equality and economic growth. More recently economic historians have taken an overdue interest. We sketch the pathways within the development literature that have been hypothesised as linking equality for women to rising incomes and the reverse channels, from higher incomes to equality. We describe how the European Marriage Pattern literature applies these mechanisms, and we highlight problems with the claimed link between equality and growth. We then explain how a crucial example of technological unemployment for women—the destruction of hand spinning during the British Industrial Revolution—contributed to the emergence of the male breadwinner family. We show how this family structure created household relationships that play into the development pathways, and outline its persistent effects into the 21st century.
Keywords: development economics; gender equality; technological unemployment; family structure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J12 J63 N33 O14 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem, nep-gen, nep-gro and nep-his
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:esohwp:_191
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).