When normative and descriptive diverge: how to bridge the difference

Jose-Luis Pinto-Prades and Jose-Maria Abellan-Perpi–an ()
Additional contact information
Jose-Maria Abellan-Perpi–an: Department of Applied Economics, Universidad de Murcia
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Jose-Maria Abellan-Perpiñan ()

No 11.06, Working Papers from Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics

Abstract: Revealed preferences are not consistent. Many anomalies have been found in different contexts. This finding leads to a divergence between normative and descriptive analyses. There are several ways of facing this problem. In this paper we argue in favour of debiasing observed choices in such a way that the “true” preferences are discovered. Our procedure is based on quantitative corrections derived from assuming the descriptive validity of prospect theory and the normative validity of Expected Utility. Those corrective formulas were first applied by Bleichrodt et al. (2001). We explain here how such formulas can be used to avoid inefficient allocation of health care resources. This approach shares the philosophy of Libertarian Paternalism (LP). However, it reduces some of the potential problems of LP: the definition of error (and the need to nudge people) is more clear and objective. In this sense, it reduces the chances that the regulator tries to nudge people toward behaviour based on her preferences and not on subject’s own preferences.

Keywords: Social debiasing; true preferences; prospect theory; discovered preferences hypothesis; libertarian paternalism. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2011-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upo.es/serv/bib/wps/econ1106.pdf First version, 2011 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: When normative and descriptive diverge: how to bridge the difference (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pab:wpaper:11.06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics Carretera de Utrera km.1, 41013 Sevilla. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publicación Digital - UPO ().