EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cellulosic Biofuels Analysis: Economic Analysis of Alternative Technologies

Craig Rismiller () and Wallace Tyner ()

No 09-06, Working Papers from Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics

Abstract: The passage of U.S. laws mandating and subsidizing advanced cellulosic biofuels may spur the development of a commercial cellulosic biofuels industry. However, a cellulosic industry will only develop if the overall economics including government incentives render investment in the sector attractive to private investors.This study compares the profitability of three biofuel production types: grain based ethanol, cellulosic biochemical ethanol, and cellulosic thermochemical biofuels. In order to compare the current profitability of each of the production types, the Biofuels Comparison Model (BCM) was developed. The BCM is a spreadsheet model that estimates the net present value (NPV) for each production type given input and output prices, technical, and financial assumptions. The BCM can be updated to reflect the current profitability through embedded web price links. The study finds that grain, biochemical, and thermochemical production types are all currently unprofitable when subsidies and mandates are ignored. However, the grain based ethanol process is predicted to be the most profitable (lowest loss) compared to the cellulosic biofuels. When the 2008 Farm Bill subsidies are added to the BCM, all three production types are projected to be profitable. With the addition of the different subsidies, the cellulosic biofuels are estimated to have higher NPV’s than grain based ethanol. When compared on an energy equivalent basis, the estimated cost of producing grain ethanol is $114/bbl. crude oil equivalent, biochemical ethanol $141/bbl., and thermochemical gasoline $108/bbl.

Keywords: biofuels; cellulosic biofuels; corn ethanol; biofuel economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/53583/2/09-06.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/53583/2/09-06.pdf [302 Found]--> https://tind-customer-agecon.s3.amazonaws.com/3506ec3f-bbaf-4b10-a135-89d71844dce5?response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%2709-06.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAXL7W7Q3XHXDVDQYS&Expires=1567853273&Signature=ewH1luFkeI9TZHRct05zFmKMolY%3D)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pae:wpaper:09-06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Debby Weber ().

 
Page updated 2019-09-11
Handle: RePEc:pae:wpaper:09-06