Implementing Disinflations in a Medium-Scale Dynamic General Equilibrium Model: Money Supply vis-à-vis Interest Rate Rules
Guido Ascari and
Tiziano Ropele
No 117, Quaderni di Dipartimento from University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods
Abstract:
Successful disinflation episodes have been shown to involve a sustained period of output contraction. We revisit the largely debated issue on the costs of different speed and timing of disinflations when monetary policy is implemented either via a money supply rule (MSR) or an interest rate rule (IRR). In terms of transitional costs, cold-turkey IRR disinflations are less expensive than those under MSR, with theoretical sacrifice ratios averaging 1.0 and 2.8 respectively, and are accomplished more rapidly. Gradual and anticipated disinflations deliver further lower sacrifice ratios. From a welfare perspective, despite the temporary economic contraction, disinflations are welfare improving. More interestingly, the overall welfare gain from disinflation is not affected by the actual policy implementation: what really matters is the achievement of a permanent lower inflation rather than how this is practically accomplished.
Keywords: Disinflation; Sacrifice ratio; Nonlinearities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E31 E5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 45 pages
Date: 2010-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dem-web.unipv.it/web/docs/dipeco/quad/ps/RePEc/pav/wpaper/q117.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pav:wpaper:117
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Quaderni di Dipartimento from University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paolo Bonomolo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).