EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Investment in ESQ compliance to be LWG certified: costs, benefits and way forwards for Bangladeshi tannery industry

Khondaker Golam Moazzem and Tamim Ahmed

No 42, CPD Report from Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD)

Abstract: Leather Working Group (LWG) is one of the most prominent global leather supply chain certifications. It is a prime prerequisite for exporting leather, particularly in US and EU markets. Yet, at the moment, Bangladesh has no LWG-certified tannery except for four located outside of its tannery estate. Among others, uncertainty regarding the benefits of LWG certification and lack of knowledge regarding good practices of globally LWG-certified tanneries are key reasons for Bangladesh tanneries not opting for LWG certification. Against this backdrop, the study has been conducted with objectives of a) conducting a cost-benefit analysis for Bangladeshi tanneries investing in ESQ compliance to be LWG certified; b) assessing the global good practices of LWG certified tanneries (particularly India), and analysing their replicability in Bangladeshi tannery industry; and c) to provide with key recommendations for the tannery industry’s stakeholders to have LWG certified tanneries in Bangladesh.

Keywords: Leather Working Group; LWG; tannery industry; supply chain; LWG certification; ESQ compliance; Bangladesh (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2023-09
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cpd.org.bd/resources/2023/10/Investment-in-LWG.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pdb:report:42

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CPD Report from Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Avra Bhattacharjee ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:pdb:report:42