Creative Synthesis, Patchworking, and Static Evaluation: How Different Modes of Collective Idea Elaboration Shape Team Exploratory Innovation

Frederic-Alexander Starmann (), Sylvia Hubner-Benz Author-2-Name-First: Sylvia Author-2-Name-Last: Hubner-Benz (), Michael Frese Author-3-Name-First: Michael Author-3-Name-Last: Frese () and Zhaoli Song Author-4-Name-First: Zhaoli Author-4-Name-Last: Song ()
Additional contact information
Frederic-Alexander Starmann: Paderborn University
Sylvia Hubner-Benz Author-2-Name-First: Sylvia Author-2-Name-Last: Hubner-Benz: Paderborn University
Michael Frese Author-3-Name-First: Michael Author-3-Name-Last: Frese: Asia School of Business; Leuphana University of Lueneburg
Zhaoli Song Author-4-Name-First: Zhaoli Author-4-Name-Last: Song: National University of Singapore

No 154, Working Papers Dissertations from Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics

Abstract: While the importance of teams for innovation and entrepreneurship is well acknowledged, research shows that teams often struggle to generate or select ideas effectively. However, research suggests that teams’ strengths show in idea elaboration, that is, in collectively developing ideas further. Yet despite its apparent relevance, this crucial phase in the idea journey remains understudied, particularly the interactions that drive successful elaboration in exploratory innovation. This study examines how entrepreneurial teams elaborate ideas through their interactions and how different modes of collective idea elaboration shape the creative output. Through qualitative video analysis of 79 entrepreneurial teams during a 60-minute exploratory innovation task, we identified four distinct modes of collective idea elaboration. Creative synthesis transforms ideas through collective reasoning, while patchworking aggregates ideas through parallel individual reasoning. Static evaluation involves judgment without development, and (expedited) closure reflects minimal collective engagement with both team and content. We characterize these modes along two analytical dimensions, engagement intensity (deep versus superficial) and engagement orientation (developmental versus evaluative), and develop a theoretical model highlighting their dynamic and situated nature. By taking a dialogical perspective, we show when and why these dimensions of engagement shift throughout the creative work process and shape an idea’s trajectory. Our findings contribute to the literature on team creativity and innovation. (abstract of the paper)

Keywords: Team Creativity and Innovation; Dialogical Perspectives; Process; Idea Elaboration; Exploratory Innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L26 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 51
Date: 2025-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eur and nep-sbm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://groups.uni-paderborn.de/wp-wiwi/RePEc/pdf/dispap/DP154.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pdn:dispap:154

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers Dissertations from Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by WP-WiWi-Info ().