Toward Resolutions and Reconciliations: Understanding the Elements of Peacebuilding in the Philippines

Adoracion M. Author_Email: Navarro and Janina Sofia H. Author_Email: Jacinto

No DP 2025-64, Discussion Papers from Philippine Institute for Development Studies

Abstract: This study examines ideology-driven armed conflicts in the Philippines and analyzes the peacebuilding elements that have contributed to durable peace across conflict-affected regions. Focusing on separatist movements in Mindanao and communist insurgencies in various areas nationwide, the study traces the historical roots of conflict, including grievances related to self-determination, land dispossession, political exclusion, and socioeconomic inequality. It then develops an analytical framework for peacebuilding that synthesizes international peace literature with Philippine experiences and institutions. Using qualitative methods, including key informant interviews with government agencies and an extensive desktop review of peace agreements, government policies, and program implementation reports, the study analyzes six core elements of peacebuilding in the Philippine context: confidence-building measures, peace agreements or preparatory instruments, socioeconomic development programs, permanent cessation of hostilities, political and legal settlements, and transitional justice and reconciliation. The analysis applies concepts from incentive compatibility and credible commitment to assess how these elements influence the strategic choices of armed groups, government actors, and communities. Findings show that peacebuilding initiatives are most effective when economic, political, and security incentives are aligned and when state commitments are perceived as credible and sustained over time. Socioeconomic interventions and immediate assistance help reduce the opportunity cost of returning to violence, while inclusive political and legal mechanisms address long-standing grievances. However, uneven implementation, delayed delivery of benefits, and gaps in institutional coordination continue to pose risks to sustaining peace. The study concludes with policy-relevant lessons and recommendations aimed at strengthening the design and implementation of peacebuilding interventions to support long-term stability and reconciliation in the Philippines. Comments to this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@pids.gov.ph.

Keywords: peacebuilding; armed conflicts; Mindanao separatism; communist insurgency; incentives and credible commitment; socioeconomic reintegration; peace agreements; cessation of hostilities; political amnesty; transitional justice and reconciliation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-pap ... g-in-the-philippines (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2025-64

DOI: 10.62986/dp2025.64

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Philippine Institute for Development Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael Ralph M. Abrigo ().