The Fall of Urdu and the Triumph of English in Pakistan: A Political Economic Analysis
John Willoughby and
Additional contact information
John Willoughby: American University
Zehra Aftab: American University
No 2020:29, PIDE-Working Papers from Pakistan Institute of Development Economics
In this paper, we investigate both how the use of language in higher education in Pakistan has evolved and why the medium of instruction remains a contested terrain. We focus on the struggle between advocates for the use of Urdu and the use of English. By examining the repeated failed attempts by high political authorities to replace English with Urdu, we demonstrate the usefulness of Avner Greif’s evolutionary, path-dependent theory of institutional change. We also argue, however, that Jack Knight’s focus on the struggle over resources is necessary if we are to understand why the futile attempts to make Urdu the dominant language of education persist.
Keywords: Higher Education; Education and Inequality; Language; Pakistan. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 I24 P16 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-isf
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/Working%20Paper/WorkingPaper-2020-29.pdf First Version, 2020 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pid:wpaper:2020:29
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in PIDE-Working Papers from Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Khurram Iqbal ().