Endowment effects at different time scenarios: the role of ownership and possession
Domenico Colucci,
Chiara Franco and
Vincenzo Valori
Discussion Papers from Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
Abstract:
The central issue of the wide literature about the endowment effect is the search for an explanation of the fact that the selling price of a good will be higher than that at which a person is willing to buy that same good, once they own it. The experimental evidence is not unanimous in replicating the results found by Kahneman et al. (1990 and 1991). The challenge is that of disentangling the several determinants that may be at work in generating the final effect, as the loss aversion is not considered the only explanation. We dig deeper by examining two of these likely determinants which remain understudied: the first is the impact that the amount of time of ownership can have on the endowment effect. The second is the type of item (non-material good and exchange goods) used to test the effect. Through an online questionnaire we investigate these aspects by using three different goods: a mug, an Amazon Gift Card and a quarterly subscription to Spotify. We also test whether the endowment effect occurs in different time scenarios, that is if participants imagine to own the good for one day, one week or one month. We find that the endowment effect clearly appears for all types of goods while less clear results take shape when considering the duration of the ownership.
Keywords: WTA/WTP gap; endowment effect; ownership experience; fungible goods; services; exchange goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-08-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-isf
Note: ISSN 2039-1854
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ec.unipi.it/documents/Ricerca/papers/2021-279.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pie:dsedps:2021/279
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().