Skill-Biased Technological Change, Inequality, and the Role of Retraining
No 7116, Working Paper from Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh
The collapse of routine occupations driven by skill-biased technological change hasshrunk economic opportunities for less-educated workers. Retraining could provide theworkers displaced by occupational decline with opportunities to gain skills that growingoccupations require. In this paper, I study the equilibrium effects of retraining in aneconomy with directed job search. Not only does retraining improve participantsâ€™ skills,it also changes non-participantsâ€™ optimal job search strategies and, in turn, their reemployment outcomes. I find that retraining reduces between-skill inequality whereas itincreases within-skill inequality. Eliminating retraining makes everyone worse off, causinglosses equivalent to a 1.5 percent drop in consumption. I also evaluate various labor marketpolicies that aim to encourage retraining participation. I show that combining retrainingwith a more generous unemployment insurance benefit is the most cost-effective policy. Italso results in the highest average welfare.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econ.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/work ... Kim%2021%20008_0.pdf (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pit:wpaper:7116
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper from Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh ().