Should public broadcasting companies be continued, scrambled, disbanded or privatized?

Kazuyoshi Ohki

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: In this paper, we construct a tractable mathematical model to examine the optimal structure of a public broadcasting company. We then compare four possible scenarios from a welfare perspective: a public broadcasting company continues operating, is scrambled, is disbanded or is privatized. In our setting, the situation where only some households choose scrambling is inferior to the situation where all households pay a license fee. However, if the need for the public broadcasting company is low, it should be disbanded. Under a uniform distribution, this reference point is that more than 50% of households agree to disband the public broadcasting company; however, this percentage is crucially dependent on the shape of the distribution. Our model also suggests that privatization of a public broadcasting company is superior to disbandment if the number of commercial broadcasting company is smaller than social optimum number.

Keywords: public broadcasting; noncommercial broadcasting; public goods; public choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 H4 H41 L5 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106766/1/MPRA_paper_106766.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:106766

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().