Why Can’t Death Penalty Stop Crime?

Hak Choi

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Economists advocate penalty to raise the demand price for a crime. Then, a higher penalty should mean less crime quantity demanded, while death penalty should eliminate the whole demand. This paper uses red-light running as an example of crime, to explain why such theory fails. It fails, because red light is a setup. When it is a setup, its purpose is to capture and penalize violation, not to eliminate violation. The pursuit of penalty revenue further explains why higher penalty comes with higher crime rate. This paper concludes that people do not demand red light or crime. Instead, they demand traffic, in order to sell their bread. That is why even death penalty can’t stop crime, if selling bread or crossing road is a crime.

Keywords: Crime; Traffic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D62 R41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-05-06
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117257/1/death05m.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:117257

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().