Zehn Thesen über die Stärken und Schwächen des soziokulturellen Ansatzes in der Entwicklungspolitik

Ten theses on the strengths and weaknesses of the socio-cultural approach in development policy

Dirk Kohnert

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Giving priority to the socio-cultural approach in development planning would increase rather than alleviate poverty and exploitation in Third World countries. Poverty is mainly due to a lack of resources (class specific) and to unequal power relations, not to imposed western consumption patterns. Value systems can only be understood in terms of their historical development, i.e. they have grown in response to and in interaction with material processes of civilisation and social differentiation. It is only by analysing this process of socio-structural differentiation that the real needs of the poor in the Third World can be identified and taken into account.

Keywords: Development Planning; Development Aid; ODA; Third World; Sub-Sahahran Africa; socio-cultural development; poverty; civilization; socio-economic differentiation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F53 F54 N47 O2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1983-09-01
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122000/1/MPRA_paper_122000.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: Zehn Thesen über die Stärken und Schwächen des soziokulturellen Ansatzes in der Entwicklungspolitik (1984)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:122000

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().