 The Economics of Global PeaceMPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Abstract: This book presents the reasons for which, given the globalization brought about by the ICT revolution, both liberalism and realism are ill suited as guides for international relations. And it argues in favor of a third option: institutionalism. The liberal ideal of progress and peace, brought about by free markets and democracy in all the countries, will not be the future of the world. And realism is restricted to the discussion of the balance of power, leaves aside the integrative and the economic international systems and generates very unstable solutions. Institutionalism is not a panacea either, there are no ideal solutions. But strong global institutions are required in a globalized world. These institutions will never work in an optimal way; they will always be challenged by the interests of the powerful countries. Institutionalism will not end military conflicts around the world, and global progress will continue to be challenged by populist nationalisms. But institutionalism is a call for a change of direction. It is a call to leave aside ideological proposals that only serve, at best, to guide us to wrong global policies, and at worst to disguise national imperialistic interests. It is a call to be congruent with the globalization brought about by the ICT revolution. The world is facing a gigantic technological opportunity, and it must reap its benefits as much as possible. Institutionalism is a call to free ourselves from rigid ideologies, and to promote ideological tolerance. The institutional proposal is based on four pillars: 1) Allowing the ICT technology to display its beneficial potential, through maximum possible economic interdependence. 2) Creating stronger international institutions – including the ones directed at expanding the global middle class - capable to guarantee mutual trust and serve as a forum to negotiate national economic interests. 3) Fostering ideological tolerance. 4) Developing a global demilitarization and nuclear control strategy that guarantees safety, and a balance of powers, at a low economic cost. Institutionalism, it is argued, is today the best possible route to guide international relations. Keywords: globalization; Carlos Obregon; ICT; revolution; liberalism; realism; institutionalism; progress; peace; Carlos Obregón; democracy; balance; power; economic; international systems; global institutions; military conflicts; global progress; ideological proposals; ideas; imperialistic interests; ICT revolution; technological opportunity; ideologies; middle class; demilitarization; nuclear; international relations (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:122462 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.