Conditional Cooperation and Costly Monitoring Explain Success in Forest Commons Management
Devesh Rustagi
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Recent evidence suggests that prosocial behaviors like conditional cooperation and costly norm enforcement can stabilize large-scale cooperation for commons management. However, field evidence on the extent to which variation in these behaviors among actual commons users accounts for natural commons outcomes is altogether missing. Here, we combine experimental measures of conditional cooperation and survey measures on costly monitoring among 49 forest user groups in Ethiopia with measures of natural forest commons outcomes to show that (i) groups vary in conditional cooperator share, (ii) groups with larger conditional cooperator share are more successful in forest commons management, and (iii) costly monitoring is a key instrument with which conditional cooperators enforce cooperation. Our findings are consistent with models of gene-culture coevolution on human cooperation and provide external validity to laboratory experiments on social dilemmas.
Keywords: Conditional Cooperation; Costly Monitoring; Forest Commons Management; Public Goods Game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C9 O1 Z1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Science 330 (2010): pp. 961-965
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/124049/1/MPRA_paper_124049.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:124049
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().