Cryptocurrency regulation in Africa: advantages, motivation, regulatory models, challenges, consequences, and principles vs. rules-based regulation
Peterson Ozili
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
This study examines cryptocurrency regulation in African countries. It identifies the advantages of cryptocurrency regulation, the regulators of cryptocurrency in African countries, and it identifies the existing cryptocurrency regulatory models in Africa. It also identifies the motivation for regulating cryptocurrency in Africa as well as the challenges and consequences of regulating cryptocurrency in Africa. The study also offers a perspective on rules-based versus principles-based cryptocurrency regulation in African countries. The study shows that majority of African countries adopt a “do-not-regulate” cryptocurrency regulatory model which indicates that cryptocurrency remains largely unregulated in many African countries. Few African countries adopt the full-scale cryptocurrency regulatory model, the total ban cryptocurrency regulatory model, the soft ban cryptocurrency regulatory model, and the use-at-own-risk cryptocurrency regulatory model.
Keywords: cryptocurrency; regulation; Africa; crypto assets; blockchain; distributed ledger (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E42 O3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/127375/1/MPRA_paper_127375.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:127375
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().