REDRUM: Robust Estimation and Design for the Random Utility Model

Anna Conte and John D. Hey

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Non-monotonicity of utility differences in CRRA-based Random Utility Models has been taken to suggest possible distortions in the estimation of risk preferences. We show that this concern is real only under restrictive assumptions on the stochastic component of the model. Under common scaling, changes in utility differences are absorbed by the precision parameter when this is estimated jointly with risk aversion, so that the likelihood in the risk aversion parameter is invariant. We then show that when different subsets of tasks are represented at different effective scales, distortions may arise if a common error scale is imposed, whereas allowing for parsimonious heteroskedasticity restores stable estimation. Simulations based on standard lottery tasks illustrate these results and clarify that the empirical relevance of non-monotonicity depends not on scaling per se, but on how the stochastic component is specified.

Keywords: random utility model; risk aversion; CRRA; experimental design; mono- tonicity; scaling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C18 C52 C91 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-05-18
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129162/1/MPRA_paper_129162.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:129162

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().