From the Nash misconception to Neuroeconomic Cardinalities: Theory of Mind

Victor Hugo Rosas Martinez

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: The present paper results from exploring what known as naturally selected, traits of Nash's work, going through unintended effects on its users to further understand the underlying structure of its salience among all economic theory and designs (e.g. as depending on the size of a group). Sect 1 introduces status quo procedures. Then it is up to the second section to unmask the indeterminacy brought in by the first. Finally, provided indeterminacy, does it become appreciable how defined settings are required if one were to conceive the whole, in reverse, deck of hidden cards which would unintentionally spread the prominence in question, that as a prosthesis, the third section carves-paves a ground to list down traits underlying the aires of somehow transcendental apophenia. The forth concludes formalizing properly implicated cytoarchitectures.

Keywords: Nash; Indeterminacy; Heterodox Economics; Neuroeconomics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B50 C73 D87 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129190/1/MPRA_paper_129190.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:129190

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().