The Mortality Input Problem: Trajectory-Dependent Death and the Lifecycle Model
Victor Zhorin
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
Heterogeneous-agent macroeconomics has reformed the income and wealth sides of the household problem. The HANK program established that aggregate dynamics require the cross-sectional distribution of marginal propensities to consume, balance-sheet exposures, and permanent income. Every model in this program inherits, without examination, a smooth actuarial mortality hazard calibrated to population life tables. This is the last unreformed input, and it is structurally wrong. The expected residual life of an agent is a value function defined on a manifold whose boundary is death. That function has a geometric property rarely stated in the economic literature: its curvature diverges at a specific power law rate as the agent approaches the boundary. Every lifecycle model that represents mortality as a smooth hazard imposes a bounded-curvature approximation on a function whose curvature is unbounded. No function in the smooth hazard class can encode the shock structure of catastrophic diagnoses that dominate individual mortality trajectories near the boundary, regardless of how many parameters the hazard contains. We establish three structural consequences. First, the population-level response to symmetric interventions is asymmetric: the worsening direction systematically exceeds the improving direction by a factor governed by a single cross-sectional moment, the covariance between boundary curvature and intervention exposure. Second, this covariance is not a small correction in clinical settings: unlike the borrowing-constraint analog in macroeconomics, where the boundary binds for a minority of agents, the mortality boundary is universal, and the population-level curvature integral diverges in a way the macroeconomic scaling intuition cannot accommodate. Third, the representation class that correctly encodes the boundary geometry exists: trained networks with piecewise-linear activation produce value functions that are exactly tropical polynomials in the max-plus semiring, with the density of the piecewise structure near the boundary encoding the curvature divergence that smooth functions cannot. A constellation of puzzles that the lifecycle literature has documented and not resolved, covering wealth decumulation, bequest dispersion, annuitization, retirement timing, portfolio composition, health expenditure at end of life, long-term care insurance, Social Security claiming, and pension tax choices. These are projections of a single geometric fact. Correcting the mortality input generates each of them as equilibrium properties of the model rather than as calibrated parameters or behavioral anomalies.
Keywords: lifecycle models; heterogeneous agents; mortality; absorbing boundaries; tropical geometry; sufficient statistics; bequest motives; annuity puzzle; retirement; portfolio choice; health expenditure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C14 E21 G11 G22 H55 I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-05-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129315/1/MPRA_paper_129315.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:129315
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().