Investment Options and Bargaining Power the Eurasian Supply Chain for Natural Gas
Franz Hubert and
Svetlana Ikonnikova ()
MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Abstract:
We use cooperative game theory to analyze how the architecture of the pipeline network determines the power structure in the supply chain for Russian gas. If the assessment is narrowly focused on the abilities to obstruct flows in the existing system, the main transit countries, Belarus and Ukraine, appear to be strong. If investment options are accounted for, however, Russia achieves clear dominance. We show that options to bypass one of the transit countries are of little strategic importance compared to Russia's direct access to its customers through the Baltic Sea. Comparing the results of our calibrated model with empirical evidence obtained from transit and import agreements we find that the Shapley value explains the power of major transit countries better than the core and the nucleolus.
Keywords: Bargaining Power; Supply Chain; Shapley Value; Gas Transport (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C71 D43 F50 F51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)
Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17854/1/MPRA_paper_17854.pdf original version (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: INVESTMENT OPTIONS AND BARGAINING POWER: THE EURASIAN SUPPLY CHAIN FOR NATURAL GAS (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:17854
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().